Suite 8 / 260 Auburn Road, Hawthorn 3122
Phone: 03 9214 4100
Fax: 03 9818 6008
enquiries@trumpetfinancial.com.au
 
 
eWombat Search
  LATEST FINANCIAL NEWS
 
Hot Issues
Retiree self-protection: A volatility-and-downturn 'bucket'
How financial advice helps create wealth.
Superannuation gender gap narrowing, research shows
All the stats you need to see how Australia is going.
Market downturns, like this one, are to be expected
ATO claws back $850m in unpaid SG in FY 17-18
‘Hefty penalties’ with TRIS payment failures, SMSFs warned
The global financial crisis: Behind us but far from over
'Huge' professional risk in SG delays, big four firm warns
What a financial adviser can add to your portfolio's returns.
ATO updates crypto guidance
Reverse mortgages: Short-term gain, long-term pain
ATO set sights on 27,000 funds in ongoing crackdown
ATO zones in on hundreds of newly created reserves
A dynamic approach to retiree spending and drawdowns
Your investment freedom-maker
Living expenses for retirees on the rise
Still a long and bumpy road to travel on the way to a U.S.-China deal
Smart spouse investing
How financial advice helps create wealth.
What the ATO will be keeping an eye on in FY19
Examining the S in SMSF
Trade tensions to choke global growth: Moody’s
Tools for budgeting, cash flow, Super and more ….
Statistics show SMSFs not just for the rich
SMSFs lose thousands in property, investment scams
Articles archive
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 4 of 2015
Articles
Should we expect stormy skies or sunshine in 2016?
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year 2015
There's no one-size-fits-all retirement income
Market Update – 30th November 2015
Diversifying and cutting costs with ETFs
Why the ATO’s new powers make SMSF compliance more important than ever
'Unretiring' retirees
The detrimental impact of poor SMSF record-keeping
Counting the cost of 'grey' divorce
Combining total-return investing with realistic investment expectations
Market Update – 31st October 2015
Another telling reminder for SMSF trustees
Death in paradise – or your SMSF
Elderly exploited for assets
Intergenerational challenges for retirement saving
Death benefits – navigating the minefield
Strategy over structure
Market Update – 3oth September 2015
SMSF and limited resource borrowing – a warning
External partnerships and the in-house asset rules
Take a closer look at SMSF age demographics
Death benefits – navigating the minefield

Despite the persistent warnings, there continues to be a range of difficulties associated with binding death benefit nominations (BDBNs) .....


...... so it’s important SMSF practitioners and their clients are aware of the common traps.



               


The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) and the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (SIS Reg) govern the regulation of superannuation in Australia. SIS Reg 6.22 states that death benefits must be paid to the deceased member's legal personal representative and/or their dependants, unless no one can be found, in which case they must be paid to an individual. Therefore if a person(s) is nominated as the recipient(s) of a deceased member's superannuation benefits is not a dependant of the deceased member, the nomination will fail. Section 10(1) of the SIS Act defines dependant to include the spouse, children and anyone with whom the deceased has an interdependency relationship.


Unfortunately, there is a tendency for people to nominate those people who are close to them as a beneficiary of their superannuation death benefits. However, the nomination will fail if they do not fit within the definition of dependant. It may be obvious, however, this type of problem often occurs in practice.


Section 59(1A) of the SIS Act allows a member to give notice to the trustee of the superannuation fund requiring the trustee to provide death benefits to the legal personal representative and/or the dependants of the member on their death. Reg 6.17A then sets out the requirements for a valid Binding Death Benefit Nomination. The nomination must:


  1. be in writing;
  2. be signed and dated by the member in the presence of two witnesses who are:
    • over the age of 18; and
    • not nominated to receive a benefit in the notice (but may be beneficiaries of the person's estate, if the legal personal representative is nominated); and
  3. contain a declaration signed and dated by the witnesses stating that the notice was signed by the member in their presence.

The wording of Reg 6.17A often causes significant problems. Reg 6.17A states that the document must be dated not only by the member but also by the two witnesses. One of the first things a lawyer will do is look at the dating of the document since often the document has been clearly dated by one person only – often the member themselves or one of the witnesses to the document. If the three dates look like they have been written on the document by the same person then it is likely that the Binding Death Benefit Nomination will be invalid.


Thankfully, SMSFD 2008/3 confirmed that Section 59 and Reg 6.17A do not apply to SMSFs. However, when preparing Binding Death Benefit Nominations for SMSFs there are three extremely important rules. The first rule is read the deed; the second rule is read the deed; and the third rule is read the deed.


Occasionally, SMSF trust deeds state that a valid BDBN must comply with the superannuation laws. The deed then goes on to define superannuation laws to mean the SIS Act and SIS Reg. In these cases a valid BDBN would need to comply with Reg 6.17A. Read the deed.


In Donovan v Donovan [2009] QSC 26, Justice Fryberg stated that superannuation legislation is convoluted and that it is easy for trustees and members to make mistakes. In Munro v Munro [2015] QSC 61 the nomination was invalid because the member (a lawyer who obviously did not practise in this area of law) wrote the words, "trustee of deceased estate". Does "trustee of deceased" mean legal personal representative as defined in Section 10 of the SIS Act? In this case, the court found that it did not and the nomination was not binding on the trustee.


Another area where problems can occur is where there is in place both a BDBN and an automatically reversionary pension. What happens? The answer is not clear and again will require a thorough reading of the trust deed. However, the solution is easy – hardwire the trust deed to create certainty.


Some trust deeds allow a member to put in place a death benefit rule or what is colloquially called an SMSF will. These types of documents are typically non-lapsing. However, if they are put in place it is absolutely crucial that they be reviewed regularly as unforeseen consequences can occur if circumstances change. They should be reviewed annually when the financial adviser sits down with their client. However, non-lapsing nominations like death benefit rules and SMSF wills have significant advantages as they will continue to be effective in the case of incapacity. Remember that a BDBN cannot be renewed if the member lacks capacity.


There is considerable argument as to whether an attorney can make or renew a BDBN. The argument will continue until legislation considers the situation. However, some trustees do accept BDBNs from the attorney for a member. I would strongly recommend that specific clauses be inserted in the member's power of attorney in this regard. It may also be prudent to amend the trust deed for an SMSF to state that the trustee must accept a BDBN for a member's attorney.


In conclusion, it is the writer's view that the implementation of a valid BDBN is far more difficult than is necessary. However, superannuation is now commonly a significant asset when organising a client's estate plan. If financial advisors and lawyers work closely together to advise clients appropriately and put in place well drafted documents, there is no reason why the use of BDBNs cannot be an effective estate planning tool.


Michael Naughtin, partner, estate planning division, RMB Lawyers



Columnist: Michael Naughtin
Wednesday 14 October 2015
smsfadviseronline.com.au




30th-October-2015
Trumpet Financial Pty Ltd ABN 11 443 516 384 Corporate Authorised Representative (No 327756) of Aon Hewitt Financial Advice Limited AFSL 239183 ABN 13 091 225 642
Registered Address: Level 33  201 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000 | Sitemap | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | About Aon Hewitt Positioning